Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.0.20021023143531.0281b498@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 12:32 AM 23/10/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>I am wondering why pg_dump has to depend on either fseek or ftell.

It doesn't - it just works better and has more features if they are 
available, much like zlib etc.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?