Re: Select .. Having vs computer fields - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Javier Dussaillant
Subject Re: Select .. Having vs computer fields
Date
Msg-id 5.0.2.1.2.20011212152736.024335a0@192.168.0.254
Whole thread Raw
In response to Select .. Having vs computer fields  (Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com>)
Responses Re: Select .. Having vs computer fields
List pgsql-general
At 12:54 PM 12/12/2001 -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote:
>Can use use computed fields on the "having" part of select?
>I have tried:
>select a,b, count(*) as dups_count from some_table having dups_count > 1;
>
>and it gives me the error "Attribute 'dups_count' not found"

You have to GROUP BY in order to use HAVING. For example:

SELECT a,b, count(*) as dups_count FROM some_table GROUP BY a,b HAVING
dups_count > 1;

You should GROUP your rows by all the columns that are not count() or other
aggregate function (like max(), min(), sum(), etc).




>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

                 Javier Dussaillant G.
                 ashkar@vrweb.cl
                 Departamento de Desarrollo VRWEB ltda.
                 http://www.vrweb.cl


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Francisco Reyes
Date:
Subject: Select .. Having vs computer fields
Next
From: Dado Feigenblatt
Date:
Subject: Re: User rights across databases