Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brian C. Doyle
Subject Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
Date
Msg-id 5.0.2.1.2.20001130113826.082b4ec0@pop.mindspring.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?  (martin.chantler@convergys.com)
Responses Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
List pgsql-general
Another thing to rember about PostgreSQL is DB Size vs CPU bits
 
8.1 CPU types - 32-bit or 64-bit
Performance of 32-bit cpu machines will decline rapidly when the database size exceeds 5 GigaByte. You can run 30 gig database on 32-bit cpu but the performance will be degraded. Machines with 32-bit cpu imposes a limitation of 2 GB on RAM, 2 GB on file system sizes and other limitations on the operating system. Use the special filesystems for linux made by SGI, IBM or HP or ext3-fs to support file-sizes greater than 2 GB on 32-bit linux machines.
For extremely large databases, it is strongly advised to use 64-bit machines like Digital Alpha cpu, Sun Ultra-sparc 64-bit cpu, Silicon graphics 64-bit cpu, Intel Merced IA-64 cpu, HPUX 64bit machines or IBM 64-bit machines. Compile PostgreSQL under 64-bit cpu and it can support huge databases and large queries. Performance of PostgreSQL for queries on large tables and databases will be several times faster than PostgreSQL on 32-bit cpu machines. Advantage of 64-bit machines are that you get very large memory addressing space and the operating system can support very large file-systems, provide better performance with large databases, support much larger memory (RAM), have more capabilities etc..

found at http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/PostgreSQL-HOWTO-8.html


At 02:50 PM 11/30/00 +0000, martin.chantler@convergys.com wrote:


I plan to convert a Foxpro system to client/server - hopefully using PostGreSQL
(about 100 tables / 300 mb / 100 users)

Firstly I heard a rumour that p-sql doesn't process queries in parellel, i.e.
performs them sequentially.
Is this true? If so it would surely make it impracticle when more than a few
clients are connected
I tried this out by running 2 VB programs via ODBC than randomly performed
queries - they appeared to work
in parallel - however I then started a PSQL session and entered a slow query it
appeared to stop the 2 VB programs until
it had completed. Anyone got the answer to this???

The other question I have is how much memory I should really have to support 100
connected clients. There must be a formula / rule of thumb for this?

I am hoping I can convince my customer to use postgresql but first I need to
convince myself it is up to the job :)
I am actually pretty impressed with it so far, its got a lot of functionality
that DB2 doesn't have

Thanks,

M Chantler
Southampton



--
NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is
intended by Convergys Corporation for the use of the named individual or entity
to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or
otherwise confidential.  If you have received this electronic mail transmission
in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it,
and notify the sender of the error by reply email or by telephone (collect), so
that the sender's address records can be corrected.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database - more info
Next
From: "Hancock, David (DHANCOCK)"
Date:
Subject: Help with Database Recovery