On 01.08.23 18:00, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> One of the main purposes of this thread is to gauge interest. I'm hoping
> there are other developers who are interested in reducing
> pg_upgrade-related downtime, and it seemed like it'd be nice to have
> built-in functionality for measuring the step times instead of requiring
> folks to apply this patch every time. And I think users might also be
> interested in this information, if for no other reason than to help us
> pinpoint which steps are taking longer for various workloads.
If it's just for developers and expert users, perhaps existing
shell-level functionality like "pg_upgrade | ts" would suffice?
