On 02.09.21 13:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 20.07.21 22:04, Filip Gospodinov wrote:
>> Anyway, this issue is orthogonal to my original patch. I'm proposing
>> to hardcode -lpgcommon and -lpgport in Libs.private instead. Patch is
>> attached.
>
> Makes sense. I think we could do it without hardcoding those library
> names, as in the attached patch. But it comes out to the same result
> AFAICT.
That is my impression too. Enumerating them in a variable would just
lead to an indirection. Please let me know if you'd still prefer a
solution without hardcoding.
