On 17.12.24 16:25, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> On 12/13/24 6:07 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> OK, that's fine with me for this patch series.
>>
>> Eventually though, I think we should have built-in versions of these
>> ASCII functions. Even if there's no actual problem, it would more
>> clearly indicate that we only care about ASCII at that particular call
>> site, and eliminate questions about what libc might do on some platform
>> for some encoding/locale combination. It would also make it easier to
>> search for locale-sensitive functions in the codebase.
>
> +1 I had exactly the same idea.
Yes, I think that could make sense.
