Re: unorthodox use of PG for a customer - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dimitri Maziuk
Subject Re: unorthodox use of PG for a customer
Date
Msg-id 4b416374-3da8-f713-a996-a398fa903d7f@bmrb.wisc.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unorthodox use of PG for a customer  (David Gauthier <davegauthierpg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 08/24/2018 02:07 PM, David Gauthier wrote:
>
> ...  He likes the idea of a
> separate DB per workarea.  He just doesn't gt it.

Well there are advantages to that.

> But for some reason, he doesn't like
> the client/server DB model which would work so nicely here.  I'm just
> trying to make sure I didn't miss some sort of solution, PG or not, that
> would work here.

What you should tell him is that he can't have it both ways. Either it's
multiple worker nodes concurrently writing to the same workstation -- in
which case he needs "a server" on the workstation to accept incoming
connections and all that overhead, with enough oomph to handle
concurrency he expects. Or it's a beefed-up central server where
everybody writes to, and every workstation can poll it and maintain its
own state databases from there (i.e. worker nodes don't talk back to
submit nodes).

--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu


Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: unorthodox use of PG for a customer
Next
From: Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
Date:
Subject: Re: unorthodox use of PG for a customer