On 7/12/21 10:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2021-Jul-12, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> 2) Do we actually need to calculate and store hotblockingattrs
>> separately in RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap? It seems to me it's either
>> NULL (with amhotblocking=false) or equal to indexattrs. So why not to
>> just get rid of hotblockingattr and rd_hotblockingattr, and do something
>> like
>>
>> case INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_HOT_BLOCKING:
>> return (amhotblocking) ? bms_copy(rel->rd_hotblockingattr) : NULL;
>>
>> I haven't tried, so maybe I'm missing something?
>
> ... What? I thought the whole point is that BRIN indexes do not cause
> the columns to become part of this set, while all other index types do.
> If you make them both the same, then there's no point.
>
Well, one of us is confused and it might be me ;-)
The point is that BRIN is the only index type with amhotblocking=false,
so it would return NULL (and thus it does not block HOT). All other
indexes AMs have amblocking=true and so should return rd_indexattr (I
forgot to change that in the code chunk).
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
