On 07/12/2012 10:01 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> FWIW, I think you could save a level of naming if you were willing to
> put the type first, since the type would imply whether the object
> lives in a schema or not:
>
> [type]/[name].sql
> [type]/[schema]/[name].sql
>
>
That will destroy the property of having everything for a given schema
collected together.
Arguably we should make a special case for the create statement of a
schema, but I'm not even sure about that.
cheers
andrew
