Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?
Date
Msg-id 4F9F14F4.1030107@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Tree view 
> I can see that "object-oriented" has been redefined so much that it can
> mean anything.

Indeed.  Just take a survey of programming languages.

> So, I suppose it doesn't hurt to leave it in the
> description.

Well, it's easier to say than "Not-Just-A-Relational Database Management
System" ;-)

Or maybe Relational++ database?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we drop the "object" from ORDBMS?