Re: pg_upgrade and statistics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Date
Msg-id 4F5F6503020000250004625F@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and statistics  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> OK, so a single 44GB tables took 2.5 minutes to analyze;  that is
> not good.  It would require 11 such tables to reach 500GB (0.5
> TB), and would take 27 minutes.  The report I had was twice as
> long, but still in the ballpark of "too long".  :-(
But it's really 600 tables of different sizes, which wound up
actually taking:
cir=# analyze;
ANALYZE
Time: 3433794.609 ms
Just under one hour.
Now, if I remember right, the cluster was down for about three
minutes to run pg_upgrade.  Until there are some statistics for key
tables, though, it's not really usable.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and statistics