Re: sortsupport for text - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: sortsupport for text
Date
Msg-id 4F588A240200002500046025@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sortsupport for text  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:45:38PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> SELECT SUM(1) FROM (SELECT * FROM randomtext ORDER BY t) x;
>> [13% faster with patch for C collation; 7% faster for UTF8]
>> I had hoped for more like a 15-20% gain from this approach, but
>> it didn't happen, I suppose because some of the instructions
>> saved just resulted in more processor stalls.  All the same, I'm
>> inclined to think it's still worth doing.
> 
> This is a border case, but I suggest that a 13% speedup on a 
> narrowly-tailored benchmark, degrading to 7% in common
> configurations, is too meager to justify adopting this patch.
We use the C collation and have character strings in most indexes
and ORDER BY clauses.  Unless there are significant contra-
indications, I'm in favor of adopting this patch.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays