Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 4F54AC26.3060607@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
(2012/03/05 21:00), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2012/03/05 18:21), Shigeru Hanada wrote:
>> (2012/02/21 20:25), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> Please find attached an updated version of the patch.
>>
>> This v2 patch can be applied on HEAD cleanly.  Compile completed with
>> only one expected warning of scan.c, and all regression tests for both
>> core and contrib modules passed.
>>
>> This patch allows FDWs to return multiple ForeignPath nodes per a
>> PlanForeignScan call.  It also get rid of FdwPlan, FDW-private
>> information container, by replacing with simple List.
>>
>> I've reviewed the patch closely, and have some comments about its design.
> 
> Thank you for your review.
> 
>> Basically a create_foo_path is responsible for creating a node object
>> with a particular Path-derived type, but this patch changes
>> create_foreignscan_path to just call PlanForeignScan and return void.
>> This change seems breaking module design.
> 
> create_index_path builds multiple index paths for a plain relation.  How
> about renaming the function to create_foreign_paths?

I meant "create_foreignscan_paths".  I'm sorry about that.

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Next
From: Shigeru Hanada
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server