Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stas Kelvich
Subject Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
Date
Msg-id 4F414A2C-85B6-41FA-8473-D6F08E3F8A11@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 10 May 2017, at 11:43, Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 09/05/17 22:11, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> On 2017-05-09 21:00, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> On 09/05/17 19:54, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>>> On 2017-05-09 11:50, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah okay, so this is same issue that's reported by both Masahiko Sawada
>>> [1] and Jeff Janes [2].
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoBYpyqTSw%2B%3DES%2BxXtRGMPKh%3DpKiqjNxZKnNUae0pSt9bg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> [2]
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMkU%3D1xUJKs%3D2etq2K7bmbY51Q7g853HLxJ7qEB2Snog9oRvDw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>
>> I don't understand why you come to that conclusion: both Masahiko Sawada
>> and Jeff Janes have a DROP SUBSCRIPTION in the mix; my cases haven't.
>> Isn't that a real difference?
>>
>

Just noted another one issue/feature with snapshot builder — when logical decoding is in progress
and vacuum full command is being issued quite a big amount of files appears in pg_logical/mappings
and reside there till the checkpoint. Also having consequent vacuum full’s before checkpoint yields even
more files.

Having two pgbench-filled instances with logical replication between them:

for i in {1..100}; do psql -c 'vacuum full' && ls -la pg_logical/mappings | wc -l; done;
VACUUM     73
VACUUM    454
VACUUM   1146
VACUUM   2149
VACUUM   3463
VACUUM   5088
<...>
VACUUM  44708
<…> // checkpoint happens somewhere here
VACUUM  20921
WARNING:  could not truncate file "base/16384/61773": Too many open files in system
ERROR:  could not fsync file "pg_logical/mappings/map-4000-4df-0_A4EA29F8-5aa5-5ae6": Too many open files in system


I’m not sure whether this is boils down to some of the previous issues mentioned here or not, so posting
here as observation.


Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rahila Syed
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn()