On 01/04/2012 06:15 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> [11:12pm]TonyC:theory: using sv_mortalcopy() instead of newSVsv()
> should prevent the leak in that workaround, assuming there's no
> FREETMPS between the call and use of the return value
That's the solution to leakiness I had in mind.
Tom said:
> 2. A slightly cleaner fix for this should be to duplicate the SV and
> then release the copy around the SvPVutf8 call, only if it's readonly.
> "Fixing" it in do_util_elog is entirely the wrong thing.
How do we tell if it's readonly?
cheers
andrew
