Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes
Date
Msg-id 4F0469F802000025000443AB@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Page Checksums + Double Writes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. The CLOG code isn't designed to manage a large number of
> buffers, so adding more might cause a performance regression on
> small systems.
> 
> On Nate Boley's 32-core system, running pgbench at scale factor
> 100, the optimal number of buffers seems to be around 32.  I'd
> like to get some test results from smaller systems - any chance
> you (or anyone) have, say, an 8-core box you could test on?
Hmm.  I can think of a lot of 4-core servers I could test on.  (We
have a few poised to go into production where it would be relatively
easy to do benchmarking without distorting factors right now.) 
After that we jump to 16 cores, unless I'm forgetting something. 
These are currently all in production, but some of them are
redundant machines which could be pulled for a few hours here and
there for benchmarks.  If either of those seem worthwhile, please
spec the useful tests so I can capture the right information.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/Perl Does not Like vstrings
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Regarding Checkpoint Redo Record