Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com> wrote:
> I still have this question:
> same statement A,B,C,D update same row. The start order is
> A->B->C-D. From what I've gotten, B/C/D got the lock before A.
> Why did that happen?
Did you do anything to prevent it from happening? If not, the OS
scheduler is going to give time to one process or another in a
fairly unpredictable way.
-Kevin
