Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)
Date
Msg-id 4EE36931.9040207@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/02/2011 06:48 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Rebased with head.

Could you comment a little more on what changed?  There were a couple of 
areas Tom commented on:

-General code fixes
-"pull out and apply the changes related to the RANGE_CONTAIN_EMPTY 
flag, and also remove the <> opclass entry"
-Subdiff issues

The third one sounded hard to deal with, so presumably nothing there.  
I'm not sure if your updated rebase addresses either of those first two 
yet or not, or if it was just fixing bitrot from upstream code changes.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support  www.2ndQuadrant.us



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements with query tree based normalization
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v3