Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches
Date
Msg-id 4EC64C400200002500043239@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I'd just drop -S.
Easily done.
> Make sure to use -c N -j N with pgbench, or you'll probably not be
> able to saturate it.
Yeah, that's part of the script I copied from you.
> I've also had good luck with wal_writer_delay=20ms, although if
> you have synchronous_commit=on that might not matter, and it's
> much less important since Simon's recent patch in that area went
> in.
What the heck; will do.
> What scale factor are you testing at?
100.  Perhaps I should boost that since I'm going as far as 128
clients?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: better support for debugging of overloaded functions
Next
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: FlexLocks