> On 2 Oct 2021, at 08:18, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> So the issue is not as serious as it seemed.
This is also not related to this patch in any way, or am I missing a point
here? This can just as well be achieved without this patch.
> The complaint remaining is only that this could somehow be documented better.
The pg_dump documentation today have a large highlighted note about this:
"When --include-foreign-data is specified, pg_dump does not check that the
foreign table is writable. Therefore, there is no guarantee that the
results of a foreign table dump can be successfully restored."
This was extensively discussed [0] when this went in, is there additional
documentation you'd like to see for this?
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
[0] https://postgr.es/m/LEJPR01MB0185483C0079D2F651B16231E7FC0@LEJPR01MB0185.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE
