Re: psql command for bytea output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: psql command for bytea output
Date
Msg-id 4EA1C2E1.3040202@pgexperts.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql command for bytea output  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/21/2011 02:51 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2011/10/21 Andrew Dunstan<andrew.dunstan@pgexperts.com>:
>> On 10/21/2011 02:44 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> 2011/10/21 Andrew Dunstan<andrew.dunstan@pgexperts.com>:
>>>> A few months ago, I blogged about the difficulty of getting psql to put a
>>>> bytea datum into a file. See
>>>>
>>>> <http://people.planetpostgresql.org/andrew/index.php?/archives/196-Clever-trick-challenge.html>.
>>>> Today I ran into the problem again, and it struck me that we could fairly
>>>> easily have a new command to handle this, called, say, bcopy. So it would
>>>> look like:
>>>>
>>>>    \bcopy (select generate_bytea()) to foo.bin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>> isn't better to fix current tools to work well with bytea?
>>>
>> Such as?
> some like
>
> \copy ... to foo.bin format binary
>
> a COPY API can do it - it support a binary load and binary dump, so
> just there is missing interface
>


That would be fine if you could suppress the file header/trailer and 
field header, so all you got was the raw data. But making COPY do that 
seems no cleaner than what I suggested.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: psql command for bytea output
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?