REVIEW: Optimizing box_penalty - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject REVIEW: Optimizing box_penalty
Date
Msg-id 4E90554F0200002500041C43@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: REVIEW: Optimizing box_penalty
List pgsql-hackers
I tried to review the "Optimizing box_penalty" patch:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=600

as posted here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4E088690.5080706@enterprisedb.com

The patch no longer applies to source code, due to other recent GiST
changes. Parts of it were modifying functions which no longer exist.
I picked out the bits which still seemed relevant, and a patch with
that is attached. The improvement in REINDEX time is now only about
0.25% on my machine at home, which is small enough that it could
easily be from code shifting around. (Or such shifts might be hiding
a larger actual savings.) In any event, this patch doesn't seem to
be justified as a performance patch, based on my benchmarks today.

On the other hand, this patch leaves the code a few lines shorter and
eliminates some unnecessary Datum wrapping, PG_FUNCTION_ARGS
parameters on a static function, and allows that function to be
called directly rather than using DirectFunctionCall2(). I find the
resulting code a little cleaner and easier to read. I would prefer
to see it applied on that basis, personally.

Since the author is a committer, and this is a pretty minor code
style patch at this point, I'll mark it "Ready for Committer" and
leave it to Heikki to decide what to do with it.

-Kevin
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SET variable - Permission issues
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq, PQdescribePrepared -> PQftype, PQfmod, no PQnullable