Postgres 8.4: archive_timeout vs. checkpoint_timeout - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Frank Lanitz
Subject Postgres 8.4: archive_timeout vs. checkpoint_timeout
Date
Msg-id 4E8D5D2D.3060308@frank.uvena.de
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Postgres 8.4: archive_timeout vs. checkpoint_timeout  (Derrick Rice <derrick.rice@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi folks,

I want to refer to a question Rob did back in 2008 at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-07/msg01167.php as we
are currently running into a similar question:
We are using warm standby via PITR using a shared drive between master
and slave node.

Our setup currently is set to archive_timeout = 60s and
checkpoint_timeout = 600s.

We expected that now every minute a WAL-file is written to the share,
but somehow we might misunderstood some part of the documentation as in
periods with low traffic on database the interval between WAL files is
>1min up to ten minutes.

However, the goal was to have a WAL file every minute so disaster
recovering can be done fast with a minimum of lost data.
Question is: What did we miss? Do we need to put checkpoint_timeout also
to 60s and does this makes sense at all?

Cheers,
Frank

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Albe Laurenz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem dbi_link with postgresql 9.04
Next
From: Robert Buckley
Date:
Subject: problem with round() in php script