Re: Temporary tables and in-memory use - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marios Vodas
Subject Re: Temporary tables and in-memory use
Date
Msg-id 4E84AB2E.7040807@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Temporary tables and in-memory use  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thank you. The setup is intended for one user environment for complex 
queries and operations that's why I wrote 2GB temp_buffers!
Thank you again, I really appreciate it.
Marios

On 29/9/2011 7:55 μμ, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marios Vodas<mvodas@gmail.com>  writes:
>> If I'm not wrong, temporary tables stay in memory if they do not go over
>> temp_buffers limit (e.g. if temp_buffers is 2GB and the size of the table is
>> 300MB the table will remain in memory).
>> What if a column is variable length (e.g. text), how does this column stay
>> in-memory since it should be stored in TOAST?
> Well, the toast table is also temp, so it'll get cached in temp_buffers
> as well, as long as it fits.
>
>> When I build a GiST index on a temporary table does the index stay in memory
>> as well?
> Same answer.
>
> Keep in mind that temp_buffers is per process, not global.  Just as with
> work_mem, you need to be careful about setting it sky-high.
>
>             regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade - add config directory setting
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost