On 2011-07-19 22:39, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 19.07.2011 12:28, Yeb Havinga wrote:
>> On 2011-07-18 22:21, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>>> The Scientific Linux 6 is not suitable, because its libselinux version
>>> is a bit older
>>> than this patch expects (libselinux-2.0.99 or later).
>>> My recommendation is Fedora 15, instead.
>> Installing right now, thanks for the heads up!
>
> Would it be reasonable to #ifdefs the parts that require version
> 2.0.99? That's very recent so might not be available on popular
> distributions for some time, so it would be nice to not have a hard
> dependency on it. You could have autoconf rules to check for the new
> functions, and only use them if they are available.
In contrary to the subject I was under the impression the current patch
is for the 9.2 release since it is in a commitfest for the 9.2 release
cycle, which would make the libselinux-2.0.99 dependency less of a problem.
--
Yeb Havinga
http://www.mgrid.net/
Mastering Medical Data
