On 19.07.2011 12:28, Yeb Havinga wrote:
> On 2011-07-18 22:21, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>> The Scientific Linux 6 is not suitable, because its libselinux version
>> is a bit older
>> than this patch expects (libselinux-2.0.99 or later).
>> My recommendation is Fedora 15, instead.
> Installing right now, thanks for the heads up!
Would it be reasonable to #ifdefs the parts that require version 2.0.99?
That's very recent so might not be available on popular distributions
for some time, so it would be nice to not have a hard dependency on it.
You could have autoconf rules to check for the new functions, and only
use them if they are available.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
