On 14.07.2011 12:42, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Fujii Masao<masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently walwriter might write out the WAL before a transaction commits.
>> IOW, walwriter tries to write out the WAL in wal_buffers in every wakeups.
>> This might be useful for long transaction which generates lots of WAL
>> records before commit. So we should call SetLatch() in XLogInsert() instead
>> of RecordTransactionCommit()? Though I'm not sure how much walwriter
>> improves the performance of synchronous commit case..
>
> Yeh, we did previously have a heuristic to write out the WAL when it
> was more than half full. Not sure I want to put exactly that code back
> into such a busy code path.
>
> I suggest that we set latch every time the wal buffers wrap.
>
> So at the bottom of AdvanceXLInsertBuffer(), if nextidx == 0 then
> SetLatch on the WALWriter.
>
> That's a simple test and we only check it if we're switch WAL buffer page.
That was my first though too - but I wonder if that's too aggressive? A
backend that does for example a large bulk load will cycle through the
buffers real quick. It seems like a bad idea to wake up walwriter
between each buffer in that case. Then again, setting a latch that's
already set is cheap, so maybe it works fine in practice.
Maybe it would be better to do it less frequently, say, every time you
switch to new WAL segment. Or every 10 buffers or something like that.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
