On 05/24/2011 09:08 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> That's not a good idea, as a) they won't point to the new projects
Uh.. why not? After six months, that should be doable.
> and b) will become steadily more out of date.
I like out-of-date pages better than unavailable ones. Especially if
they clearly state they clearly state that they are unmaintained and
point to the new location.
Regards
Markus Wanner
