On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The alternative to providing forwarding is to keep pgfoundry up for a
>> year after we start telling people to move off of it, but gradually lock
>> out activity on pgfoundry. That way there would be a transition period
>> during which the new locations for projects could climb the search results.
That's why the proposal gave a six month transition time and not
something shorter.
> At the end of this period, can we just make pgfoundry generated pages
> static, for memory and not to break links at all ?
That's not a good idea, as a) they won't point to the new projects and
b) will become steadily more out of date.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
