Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Darren Duncan
Subject Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype
Date
Msg-id 4DC47416.6020204@darrenduncan.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype  (Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net>)
Responses Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
To follow-up, an additional feature that would be useful and resembles union 
types is the variant where you could declare a union type first and then 
separately other types could declare they are a member of the union.  I'm 
talking about loosely what mixins or type-roles or interfaces etc are in other 
languages.  The most trivial example would be declaring an ENUM-alike first and 
then separately declaring the component values where the latter declare they are 
part of the ENUM, and this could make it easier to add or change ENUM values. 
But keep in mind that this is a distinct concept from what we're otherwise 
talking about as being union types. -- Darren Duncan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Prefered Types