Re: amazon ec2 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: amazon ec2
Date
Msg-id 4DC1E92D.5020904@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: amazon ec2  (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>)
Responses Re: amazon ec2
Re: amazon ec2
Re: amazon ec2
List pgsql-performance
> FWIW, EnterpriseDB's "InfiniCache" provides the same caching benefit. The way that works is when PG goes to evict a
pagefrom shared buffers that page gets compressed and stuffed into a memcache cluster. When PG determines that a given
pageisn't in shared buffers it will then check that memcache cluster before reading the page from disk. This allows you
tocache amounts of data that far exceed the amount of memory you could put in a physical server. 

So memcached basically replaces the filesystem?

That sounds cool, but I'm wondering if it's actually a performance
speedup.  Seems like it would only be a benefit for single-row lookups;
any large reads would be a mess.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres 9.0.4 + Hot Standby + FusionIO Drive + Performance => Query failed ERROR: catalog is missing 1 attribute(s) for relid 172226
Next
From: david@lang.hm
Date:
Subject: Re: amazon ec2