> Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> My sense is that for basic read/write/update/delete the driver
>>> works just fine. However I'd like to compile a list of everyone's
>>> gripe.
>>
>> At the top of my list is the need to use a cursor to avoid
>> materializing the entire result set in heap during execution of an
>> execute method. Pulling data off the wire should be done in
>> ResultSet.next() method.
>
> Do you mean something beyond the batching you can do by setting a
> suitable fetchsize?
> Or do you mean you want to lift the restrictions on when that
> batching can actually be used?
I'm talking about doing this even when a cursor isn't used, no
fetchSize is set, and without the restrictions (like autoCommit being
off and the query string being a single statement). Unfortunately I
didn't see the other thread on this topic before I responded to this
thread, so we should probably let the point die on this thread.
-Kevin
