On 3/24/11 8:16 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>> At least as I understand it, it's not our project policy to carry
>>> around code that doesn't accomplish anything useful. I have no
>>> objection to keeping the field; I simply think that if we're
>>> going to have it, we should make it work
>
>> What a stupid conversation.
>
> That hardly seems like a convincing response. Adding a column to a
> view when the column contains meaninful values seems less likely to
> break things than initially adding it with a different value,
> identical to another column, and then changing the semantics.
>
> +1 for either dropping it or making it work.
+1
Joe
--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
