Re: Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication)
Date
Msg-id 24743.1300979157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication)  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> +1 for either dropping it or making it work.

That's my feeling also.  There is *no* reason that we can't add a column
to the status view later, and every probability that we will find
reasons other than this to do so.  So if the column isn't going to
provide useful information in 9.1, let's just drop it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: sync rep & fsync=off
Next
From: Joseph Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication)