Florian Weimer wrote:
> Kevin Grittner:
>> Well, unless you use timestamp WITH time zone, you might not be
>> able to do that at all. There are very few places where timestamp
>> WITHOUT time zone actually makes sense.
>
> I don't think PostgreSQL keeps track of actual time zone values,
True -- TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE is always stored in UTC, which makes
it part of a consistent time stream. If you use TIMESTAMP WITHOUT
TIME ZONE, then unless you go to a lot of trouble you have a gap in
your time line in the spring and an overlap in autumn. With enough
work you can dance around that, but it's a heck of lot easier when
you can count on the UTC storage.
It sounds like you've successfully managed to find a way to dance
around it, so it might not be worth trying to refactor now; but I'd
bet your code would be simpler and more robust if you worked with the
data type intended to represent a moment in the stream of time
instead of constantly trying to pin the WITHOUT TIME ZONE to a time
zone (UTC) explicitly.
-Kevin
