FW: B7 option - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Barry Bell
Subject FW: B7 option
Date
Msg-id 4D51A19E0157604B94159573456A98FA2E7ACFBA@BLUPRD0811MB413.namprd08.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: B7 option  (Barry Bell <Barry_Bell@harte-hanks.com>)
List pgsql-odbc
If there a is a LF(char(10) inside a string and the B7=1, the string returned by the driver will cut off 1 character
foreach LF(chr(10) inside the string.
 
If the B7=0 the full string si returned.

Field='ABC (LF)123'

Ex:  B7=1
Field='ABC (LF)12'
EX B7=0:
Field='ABC (LF)123'

Any idea why a chr(10) (LF) in a field would cause this?

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Inoue, Hiroshi
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:20 PM
To: Barry Bell
Cc: Frank A. U.; psql-odbc
Subject: Re: [ODBC] B7 option

Hi Barry,

(2013/07/31 23:29), Barry Bell wrote:
> Hi:
>    I was using the last odbc driver (9.1.200) to get a character field with CR and LF.
> With the following connection string, the last character was getting cut off (When a CR LF was in the fied).
> Driver={PostgreSQL UNICODE};Server= 
> server.servicer.com;Port=5432;Database=dbname;Uid=user;Pwd=pwd;BI=2;Te
> xtAsLongVarchar=1;UnknownSizes=2;UseServerSidePrepare=1; 
> B0=254;B7=0;C5=1;

Contradictory options TextAsLongVarchar=1 and B7=0 are specified.
Psqlodbc drivers eat the tokens one by one and overwrite the former option by the latter one after all.

> Changing the B7 to B7=0 corrects the issue (no cut off at the end)

Changing to B7=1?

> Driver={PostgreSQL UNICODE};Server= 
> server.servicer.com;Port=5432;Database=dbname;Uid=user;Pwd=pwd;BI=2;Te
> xtAsLongVarchar=1;UnknownSizes=2;UseServerSidePrepare=1; 
> B0=254;B7=1;C5=1;
>
> Documentation on the B7 is a little scarce but most say the B7 is the same as the TextasLongVarchar, but changing the
TextaslongVarcharhas no offection on this option.
 
>
> What happens when the B7 is set 0?   (and textaslongvarhar=1)


pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: OIDs > 2147483647 still a problem for the Unicode version ( 32 bit ) ?
Next
From: "Inoue, Hiroshi"
Date:
Subject: Re: B7 option