Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mladen Gogala
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date
Msg-id 4D4B231C.3030802@vmsinfo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Chris Browne wrote:
> Well, the community declines to add hints until there is actual
> consensus on a good way to add hints.
>
OK. That's another matter entirely.   Who should make that decision? Is
there a committee or a person who would be capable of making that decision?

> Nobody has ever proposed a way to add hints where consensus was arrived
> at that the way was good, so...
>

So, I will have to go back on my decision to use Postgres and
re-consider MySQL? I will rather throw away the effort invested in
studying Postgres than to risk an unfixable application downtime.  I am
not sure about the world domination thing, though. Optimizer hints are a
big feature that everybody else has and Postgres does not have because
of religious reasons.

--

Mladen Gogala
Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212) 329-5251
http://www.vmsinfo.com
The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Shaun Thomas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...