Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date
Msg-id 871v3o3jgu.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com (Mladen Gogala) writes:
> I must say that this purist attitude is extremely surprising to
> me. All the major DB vendors support optimizer hints, yet in the
> Postgres community, they are considered bad with almost religious
> fervor.
> Postgres community is quite unique with the fatwa against hints.

Well, the community declines to add hints until there is actual
consensus on a good way to add hints.

Nobody has ever proposed a way to add hints where consensus was arrived
at that the way was good, so...
--
http://linuxfinances.info/info/nonrdbms.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #192.  "If I appoint someone as my consort,
I will  not subsequently inform  her that she  is being replaced  by a
younger, more attractive woman.  <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Mladen Gogala
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...