On 25.01.2011 06:29, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2011/1/25 Noah Misch<noah@leadboat.com>:
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:32:02AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> because I am not sure so any complex solution can be done to deadline
>>> for 9.1, I created a patch that is based on Tom ideas - just
>>> explicitly detoast function parameters.
>>
>> I can confirm that, for your original test case, this yields performance
>> comparable to that of your original patch.
>
> I know it :(. I am thinking, so detoasting on usage is better, but I
> am don't know more about Tom or Rober's plans.
Detoasting on first usage, ie. exec_eval_datum(), seems the best to me.
Compared to detoasting on assignment, it avoids the performance
regression if the value is never used, and I don't think checking if the
value is toasted at every exec_eval_datum() call adds too much overhead.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
