Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Date
Msg-id 4D397FE4.2020709@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sync Rep for 2011CF1  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
List pgsql-hackers
(grr, I wrote this on Monday already, but just found it in my drafts 
folder, unsent)

On 15.01.2011 23:40, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> Here's the latest patch for sync rep.
>
>> From here, I will be developing the patch further on public git
> repository towards commit. My expectation is that commit is at least 2
> weeks away, though there are no major unresolved problems. I expect
> essential follow on patches to continue for a further 2-4 weeks after
> that first commit.

Thanks! Some quick observations after first read-through:

* The docs for synchronous_replication still claim that it means two 
different things in master and standby. Looking at the code, I believe 
that's not true anymore.

* it seems like overkill to not let clients to even connect when 
allow_standalone_primary=off and no synchronous standbys are available. 
What if you just want to run a read-only query?

* Please separate the hot standby feedback loop into a separate patch on 
top of the synch rep patch. I know it's not a lot of code, but it's 
still easier to handle features separately.

* The UI differs from what was agreed on here: 
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4D1DCF5A.7070808@enterprisedb.com.

* Instead of the short-circuit for autovacuum in SyncRepWaitOnQueue(), 
it's probably better to set synchronous_commit=off locally when the 
autovacuum process starts.

* the "queue id" thing is dead code at the moment, as there is only one 
queue. I gather this is a leftover from having different queues for 
"apply", "sync", "write" modes, but I think it would be better to just 
remove it for now.

PS, I'm surprised how small this patch is. Thinking about it some more, 
I don't know why I expected this to be a big patch.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery"