Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql
Date
Msg-id 4D27CB1096EF1C408F4BFAB0046EC7B667D93C@ausmailid.aus.pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to integration of pgcluster into postgresql  (Chahine Hamila <chahine.hamila@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql
List pgsql-hackers
Adding -hackers back in...

-----Original Message-----
>From: Chahine Hamila [mailto:chahine.hamila@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Fri 8/25/2006 8:36 PM
>To: Jim Nasby
>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] integration of pgcluster into postgresql
>
>> First, you need to review all the past discussion
>> about the very
>> intentional decision not to build any replication
>> into the core
>> database.
>
>I would gladly do so. Can you send me any pointer?

I don't really have any handy, but try searching the hackers archive for 'replication'.

>> Second, pgcluster is (AFAIK) command-based
>> replication, which has some
>> very, very serious drawbacks. If PostgreSQL were to
>> include a
>> replication solution, I'd certainly hope it wouldn't
>> be command-based.
>
>It's better than no replication at all... It's good
>enough for many uses.

As is Slony. And dbmirror. And pgpool. So where do we draw the line? Should we include all four?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: tsvector/tsearch equality and/or portability issue
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Rtree circle ops