Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0
Date
Msg-id 4D084D48.803@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Complier warnings on mingw gcc 4.5.0  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/14/2010 12:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Another line of attack is that we know from the response packet that the
> failure is being reported at guc.c:4794.  It would be really useful to
> know what the call stack is there.  Could you change that elog to an
> elog(PANIC) and get a stack trace from the ensuing core dump?
>

That didn't work. But git bisect says it's this commit that's to blame:
<https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/e710b65c1c56ca7b91f662c63d37ff2e72862a94>

It's too late to dig further now.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_execute_from_file, patch v10
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: unlogged tables