Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm still not convinced that using shared memory is a bad way to
>> pass these around. Surely we're not talking about large numbers
>> of them. What am I missing here?
>
> They're not of a very predictable size.
Surely you can predict that any snapshot is no larger than a fairly
small fixed portion plus sizeof(TransactionId) * MaxBackends? So,
for example, if you're configured for 100 connections, you'd be
limited to something under 1kB, maximum?
-Kevin
