Re: SSI using rw-conflict lists - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: SSI using rw-conflict lists
Date
Msg-id 4CF3B9CE0200002500037F20@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSI using rw-conflict lists  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Maybe invent a short name for PredLockTranList and/or the fields?
Done:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kgrittn/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=44c8f221100b87fc7c23425f53f2fd38d735b7d2
> I'd suggest a union field.
Done:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/kgrittn/postgres.git;a=commitdiff;h=c6194da36186f8b13785cf606cda2a77f4422afc
Thanks for the feedback!
By the way, the serializable branch on my git repo is back to stable
now, if anyone wants to play with it.
Before going on to finish the graceful degradation work per previous
discussions, I'll try integrating the "IDLE IN TRANSACTION
cancellation" from the current CF to provide feedback from a
practical use case.  If Andres's patch works in that context, it
will allow SSI to provide a "guarantee of progress" even in the most
contrived and pessimal workloads.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: directory archive format for pg_dump
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: improving foreign key locks