Re: max_wal_senders must die - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date
Msg-id 4CBDC067.2020408@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_wal_senders must die  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stefan, Dimitri,
> I disagree - limiting the maximum number of replication connections is> important for my usecases.

Can you explain more?  I clearly don't understand your use case.

> If we want something fixed *now*, should we perhaps just bump the
> *default* value for max_wal_senders to 5 or something?

If we're not going to remove it, then the default should be -1, which 
should mean "same as max_connections".

--                                   -- Josh Berkus                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                           http://www.pgexperts.com
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplifying replication
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die