Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Date
Msg-id 4CAAEABC0200002500036504@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>>>>> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't
>>>>>>> handle a requirement that a particular commit be replicated
>>>>>>> to (A || B) && (C || D).
>>>>>> Good point.
>>>
>>> Asking for quorum_commit = 3 would cover that requirement.
>>>
>>> Not exactly as requested,
>> That's just not the same thing.
> 
> In what important ways does it differ?
When you have one server functioning at each site you'll block until
you get a third machine back, rather than replicating to both sites
and remaining functional.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: is sync rep stalled?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_filedump for 9.0?