Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Date
Msg-id 4C41B9820200002500033810@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Review: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway  wrote:
> Should I be installing Florian's patch in addition to yours when I
> start testing?
There's some manual fix-up needed, primarily because we need to
differentiate between SERIALIZABLE and REPEATABLE READ isolation
levels, and therefore replaced the IsXactIsoLevelSerializable macro
with IsXactIsoLevelXactSnapshotBased and
IsXactIsoLevelFullySerializable.  If you can wait until tomorrow,
I'll create a merged patch for you and confirm that it passes the
modified Florian's pgbench test (with the FOR SHARED clause
removed).  I'll include a crude hack to pgbench I had to use to test
this, with an explanation of why it was needed.  I'm still trying to
put together better testing techniques for the long term.
> Also, where can I get the latest and greatest version of your
> patch?
There's always the git repository, but I'll post a new patch
tomorrow, based on what I've recently found.

-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Selena Deckelmann
Date:
Subject: Re: Broken due to CVS branching? .bki has wrong info for build
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Patch for phypot - Pygmy Hippotause