(2010/06/15 12:28), Tom Lane wrote:
> KaiGai Kohei<kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> writes:
>>>>> The attached patch tries to add one more security hook on the
>>>>> initialization of PostgreSQL instance (InitPostgres()).
>
>>> Yeah, but so what? Stephen's point is still valid.
>
>> On the hook, I'd like to obtain security context of the client process
>> which connected to the PostgreSQL instance. It is not available at the
>> _PG_init() phase, because clients don't connect yet.
>
> InitPostgres is called by a number of process types that don't *have*
> clients. I concur with the other opinions that this hook is badly
> thought out.
>
I intended to skip it when InitPostgres() is called without clients.
For example, the hook might be better to put on PerformAuthentication()
for more clarification of the purpose.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>