Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
Date
Msg-id 4BFBDC180200002500031A87@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> wrote:
> Have you ever looked at one of those queries, that Londiste or
> Slony issue against the provider DB in order to get all the log
> data that has been committed between two snapshots? Is that really
> the best you can think of?
No, I admit I haven't.  In fact, I was thinking primarily in terms
of log-driven situations, like HS.  What would be the best place for
me to look to come up to speed on your use case?  (I'm relatively
sure that the issue isn't that there's no information to find, but
that a sequential pass over all available information would take a
*long* time.)  I've been working through the issues on WAL-based
replicas, and have some additional ideas and alternatives, but I'd
like to see the "big picture", including trigger-based replication,
before posting.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dan Ports
Date:
Subject: Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
Next
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronization levels in SR