Samuel Stearns <SStearns@internode.com.au> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> transaction_timestamp() is exactly the same thing as now().
> I got into trouble using now() before.
Using what? What kind of trouble?
> Transaction_timestamp() is really what I need, I think.
test=# \x
Expanded display is on.
test=# begin;
BEGIN
test=# select now(), current_timestamp, transaction_timestamp();
-[ RECORD 1 ]---------+------------------------------
now | 2010-05-25 12:41:34.365224-05
now | 2010-05-25 12:41:34.365224-05
transaction_timestamp | 2010-05-25 12:41:34.365224-05
[wait ten seconds or so...]
test=# select now(), current_timestamp, transaction_timestamp();
-[ RECORD 1 ]---------+------------------------------
now | 2010-05-25 12:41:34.365224-05
now | 2010-05-25 12:41:34.365224-05
transaction_timestamp | 2010-05-25 12:41:34.365224-05
test=# commit;
COMMIT
test=# select now(), current_timestamp, transaction_timestamp();
-[ RECORD 1 ]---------+------------------------------
now | 2010-05-25 12:41:50.765224-05
now | 2010-05-25 12:41:50.765224-05
transaction_timestamp | 2010-05-25 12:41:50.765224-05
> BEGIN;
> INSERT INTO blah_archive (id, user) SELECT id, user FROM blah
> where date < (now() - '30 days'::interval);
> DELETE FROM blah where date < (now() - '30 days'::interval);
> END;
>
> The now() on the INSERT will be a different time than the now() on
> the DELETE
What makes you think that?
-Kevin
